← Back to context Comment by john_strinlai 21 hours ago id imagine that they received more than just the poc in the report they received 3 comments john_strinlai Reply Xirdus 21 hours ago That doesn't make reviewing the POC any less valuable. john_strinlai 21 hours ago what value do you believe renaming the variable from "g" to something else provides the linux maintainers? Xirdus 20 hours ago It makes the exploit code more readable. We all love to laugh at C folks but for real, even Linux kernel maintainers care about readability.
Xirdus 21 hours ago That doesn't make reviewing the POC any less valuable. john_strinlai 21 hours ago what value do you believe renaming the variable from "g" to something else provides the linux maintainers? Xirdus 20 hours ago It makes the exploit code more readable. We all love to laugh at C folks but for real, even Linux kernel maintainers care about readability.
john_strinlai 21 hours ago what value do you believe renaming the variable from "g" to something else provides the linux maintainers? Xirdus 20 hours ago It makes the exploit code more readable. We all love to laugh at C folks but for real, even Linux kernel maintainers care about readability.
Xirdus 20 hours ago It makes the exploit code more readable. We all love to laugh at C folks but for real, even Linux kernel maintainers care about readability.
That doesn't make reviewing the POC any less valuable.
what value do you believe renaming the variable from "g" to something else provides the linux maintainers?
It makes the exploit code more readable. We all love to laugh at C folks but for real, even Linux kernel maintainers care about readability.