← Back to context Comment by boston_clone 15 hours ago it’s a CVE write up; the audience for these knows what an LPE is. 12 comments boston_clone Reply acdha 14 hours ago That’s very optimistic. I’d bet there are an order of magnitude more people wondering how exposed they are than security researchers reading this. staticassertion 13 hours ago https://duckduckgo.com/?q=LPE+security&ia=webwow acdha 11 hours ago Sure, nobody’s saying it’s an inscrutable mystery but if your goal is to inform a wide audience it’s considered good form to expand all but the most common acronyms. It’ll even get you more internet points than petty smugness. 1 reply → hackernudes 14 hours ago I've read many CVEs (somehow that acronym is ok... heh) but have never seen LPE despite being familiar with the concept. staticassertion 13 hours ago That seems literally borderline impossible. smaudet 12 hours ago You should re-evaluate your probabilities, I too have heard frequently of CVEs, but never of an LPE. 3 replies → stackghost 9 hours ago I could see it for someone who is only somewhat in tune with security work today.Back in the day those of us breaking into shitty php sites didn't use LPE, we used "privesc", IIRC. no-name-here 11 hours ago Content at the OP link http://copy.fail seems fairly different from any normal CVE I’ve seen.
acdha 14 hours ago That’s very optimistic. I’d bet there are an order of magnitude more people wondering how exposed they are than security researchers reading this. staticassertion 13 hours ago https://duckduckgo.com/?q=LPE+security&ia=webwow acdha 11 hours ago Sure, nobody’s saying it’s an inscrutable mystery but if your goal is to inform a wide audience it’s considered good form to expand all but the most common acronyms. It’ll even get you more internet points than petty smugness. 1 reply →
staticassertion 13 hours ago https://duckduckgo.com/?q=LPE+security&ia=webwow acdha 11 hours ago Sure, nobody’s saying it’s an inscrutable mystery but if your goal is to inform a wide audience it’s considered good form to expand all but the most common acronyms. It’ll even get you more internet points than petty smugness. 1 reply →
acdha 11 hours ago Sure, nobody’s saying it’s an inscrutable mystery but if your goal is to inform a wide audience it’s considered good form to expand all but the most common acronyms. It’ll even get you more internet points than petty smugness. 1 reply →
hackernudes 14 hours ago I've read many CVEs (somehow that acronym is ok... heh) but have never seen LPE despite being familiar with the concept. staticassertion 13 hours ago That seems literally borderline impossible. smaudet 12 hours ago You should re-evaluate your probabilities, I too have heard frequently of CVEs, but never of an LPE. 3 replies → stackghost 9 hours ago I could see it for someone who is only somewhat in tune with security work today.Back in the day those of us breaking into shitty php sites didn't use LPE, we used "privesc", IIRC.
staticassertion 13 hours ago That seems literally borderline impossible. smaudet 12 hours ago You should re-evaluate your probabilities, I too have heard frequently of CVEs, but never of an LPE. 3 replies → stackghost 9 hours ago I could see it for someone who is only somewhat in tune with security work today.Back in the day those of us breaking into shitty php sites didn't use LPE, we used "privesc", IIRC.
smaudet 12 hours ago You should re-evaluate your probabilities, I too have heard frequently of CVEs, but never of an LPE. 3 replies →
stackghost 9 hours ago I could see it for someone who is only somewhat in tune with security work today.Back in the day those of us breaking into shitty php sites didn't use LPE, we used "privesc", IIRC.
no-name-here 11 hours ago Content at the OP link http://copy.fail seems fairly different from any normal CVE I’ve seen.
That’s very optimistic. I’d bet there are an order of magnitude more people wondering how exposed they are than security researchers reading this.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=LPE+security&ia=web
wow
Sure, nobody’s saying it’s an inscrutable mystery but if your goal is to inform a wide audience it’s considered good form to expand all but the most common acronyms. It’ll even get you more internet points than petty smugness.
1 reply →
I've read many CVEs (somehow that acronym is ok... heh) but have never seen LPE despite being familiar with the concept.
That seems literally borderline impossible.
You should re-evaluate your probabilities, I too have heard frequently of CVEs, but never of an LPE.
3 replies →
I could see it for someone who is only somewhat in tune with security work today.
Back in the day those of us breaking into shitty php sites didn't use LPE, we used "privesc", IIRC.
Content at the OP link http://copy.fail seems fairly different from any normal CVE I’ve seen.