← Back to context Comment by Nevin1901 17 hours ago These are all fairly standard terms.... nothing crazy 5 comments Nevin1901 Reply dwb 9 hours ago If that’s the case, and it certainly isn’t for Emacs, my preferred editor, then it should become non-standard. shimman 16 hours ago lol those are extremely anti-consumer and anti-human behaviors. Some of us don't want to live in a corporate hell holes. OccamsMirror 16 hours ago Yes, but the companies want to reserve the right to turn evil later. komali2 16 hours ago Is it? My editor's terms of service seem much more user friendly:https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html DougBTX 11 hours ago Zed is also released under GPL 3:https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/LICENSE-GPL
dwb 9 hours ago If that’s the case, and it certainly isn’t for Emacs, my preferred editor, then it should become non-standard.
shimman 16 hours ago lol those are extremely anti-consumer and anti-human behaviors. Some of us don't want to live in a corporate hell holes. OccamsMirror 16 hours ago Yes, but the companies want to reserve the right to turn evil later.
komali2 16 hours ago Is it? My editor's terms of service seem much more user friendly:https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html DougBTX 11 hours ago Zed is also released under GPL 3:https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/LICENSE-GPL
DougBTX 11 hours ago Zed is also released under GPL 3:https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/LICENSE-GPL
If that’s the case, and it certainly isn’t for Emacs, my preferred editor, then it should become non-standard.
lol those are extremely anti-consumer and anti-human behaviors. Some of us don't want to live in a corporate hell holes.
Yes, but the companies want to reserve the right to turn evil later.
Is it? My editor's terms of service seem much more user friendly:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html
Zed is also released under GPL 3:
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/LICENSE-GPL