← Back to context Comment by estimator7292 1 day ago Lot of faux-intellectual buzzwords in there, bud 2 comments estimator7292 Reply adi_kurian 19 hours ago An aggressive polemic, but faux-intellectual is a tad unfair, perhaps even patronizing, I may say. michaelsshaw 1 day ago Such as? Was it "shit" or "dickriders"? Or was it "anarcho-capitalist", a well-defined concept? Sorry if I'm not receptive to waxing poetic about mass surveillance and the fact that you can't skip a move in chess.
adi_kurian 19 hours ago An aggressive polemic, but faux-intellectual is a tad unfair, perhaps even patronizing, I may say.
michaelsshaw 1 day ago Such as? Was it "shit" or "dickriders"? Or was it "anarcho-capitalist", a well-defined concept? Sorry if I'm not receptive to waxing poetic about mass surveillance and the fact that you can't skip a move in chess.
An aggressive polemic, but faux-intellectual is a tad unfair, perhaps even patronizing, I may say.
Such as? Was it "shit" or "dickriders"? Or was it "anarcho-capitalist", a well-defined concept? Sorry if I'm not receptive to waxing poetic about mass surveillance and the fact that you can't skip a move in chess.