← Back to context

Comment by WalterGR

17 hours ago

Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47988880

"Richard Dawkins and The Claude Delusion: The great skeptic gets taken in" (garymarcus.substack.com)

18 points | 2 hours ago | 16 comments

So we know Claude is deterministic, but does that mean it is not conscious?

Or what is the reasoning exactly?

  • It largely comes down to how you define the term. Personally, I think anything that includes software (...of only tepid determinism, as we do explicitly add pseudorandomness) is not a particularly useful term.

    Regardless, Dawkins seems to not have much interesting to add about the topic. A consistent theme for the last few decades, I must say.