← Back to context Comment by outside1234 18 hours ago All three of these theories can be true 7 comments outside1234 Reply TeMPOraL 15 hours ago In which case the market is working as intended. Dylan16807 12 hours ago If all three are true then the market is 2/3 working as intended and 1/3 held back by patents that aren't being licensed out enough. mhb 2 hours ago Alternatively, if all three are true, 1/3 are held back because of the lack of incentive to develop an invention. ezfe 15 hours ago Is someone saying otherwise here? natpalmer1776 13 hours ago YahooTube’s comment is heavily implying that the market systems in-place stifled invention via patent restrictions. 2 replies →
TeMPOraL 15 hours ago In which case the market is working as intended. Dylan16807 12 hours ago If all three are true then the market is 2/3 working as intended and 1/3 held back by patents that aren't being licensed out enough. mhb 2 hours ago Alternatively, if all three are true, 1/3 are held back because of the lack of incentive to develop an invention. ezfe 15 hours ago Is someone saying otherwise here? natpalmer1776 13 hours ago YahooTube’s comment is heavily implying that the market systems in-place stifled invention via patent restrictions. 2 replies →
Dylan16807 12 hours ago If all three are true then the market is 2/3 working as intended and 1/3 held back by patents that aren't being licensed out enough. mhb 2 hours ago Alternatively, if all three are true, 1/3 are held back because of the lack of incentive to develop an invention.
mhb 2 hours ago Alternatively, if all three are true, 1/3 are held back because of the lack of incentive to develop an invention.
ezfe 15 hours ago Is someone saying otherwise here? natpalmer1776 13 hours ago YahooTube’s comment is heavily implying that the market systems in-place stifled invention via patent restrictions. 2 replies →
natpalmer1776 13 hours ago YahooTube’s comment is heavily implying that the market systems in-place stifled invention via patent restrictions. 2 replies →
In which case the market is working as intended.
If all three are true then the market is 2/3 working as intended and 1/3 held back by patents that aren't being licensed out enough.
Alternatively, if all three are true, 1/3 are held back because of the lack of incentive to develop an invention.
Is someone saying otherwise here?
YahooTube’s comment is heavily implying that the market systems in-place stifled invention via patent restrictions.
2 replies →