← Back to context

Comment by arjie

12 hours ago

I clicked through to the source for Amnesty International scrutinizing the claims and that likely 3000 people have died and it reads:

> On 17 January, in a public speech, Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader, said “thousands of people” were killed. Since then, on 21January, Iran’s Supreme Council of National Security issued a statement that 3,117 people were killed during the uprising. However, on 16 January 2026, the UN Special Rapporteur on Iran, Mai Sato, said in a media interview that at least 5,000 people had been killed, noting that according to information she received from medical sources, the death toll might be as high as 20,000

The only way for someone to read that as “likely 3000 people have died” is if one takes the Iranian numbers as fact. For those whose experience is that authoritarian states crushing protests provide accurate numbers this might be somewhat convincing. To say nothing of the fact that this is a stupendous number of people.

I found it convincing of the opposite: that this is not a neutral summary of the context.

> this is not a neutral summary of the context

Where do you prefer to get neutral summaries from?