← Back to context Comment by bitwize 12 hours ago It was either permit DRM, or cut off the web for all sorts of media. 5 comments bitwize Reply RandomGerm4n 9 hours ago There would still be piracy sites. So their choice would be between everyone watching it for free or offering their service without drm. ekianjo 9 hours ago It was a bad position for him to take. dirasieb 5 hours ago the web was famously cut off for all sorts of media before DRM was permitted redeeman 9 hours ago easy choice. also, thats just BS, remember how SOMEHOW the same was said for playback of music on computers, yet somehow a certain now-dead CEO was able to say "fuck you" and it happened anyway? muglug 6 hours ago Not sure if Spotify got that same memo.
RandomGerm4n 9 hours ago There would still be piracy sites. So their choice would be between everyone watching it for free or offering their service without drm.
redeeman 9 hours ago easy choice. also, thats just BS, remember how SOMEHOW the same was said for playback of music on computers, yet somehow a certain now-dead CEO was able to say "fuck you" and it happened anyway? muglug 6 hours ago Not sure if Spotify got that same memo.
There would still be piracy sites. So their choice would be between everyone watching it for free or offering their service without drm.
It was a bad position for him to take.
the web was famously cut off for all sorts of media before DRM was permitted
easy choice. also, thats just BS, remember how SOMEHOW the same was said for playback of music on computers, yet somehow a certain now-dead CEO was able to say "fuck you" and it happened anyway?
Not sure if Spotify got that same memo.