← Back to context

Comment by loloquwowndueo

4 hours ago

> perpendicularly misaligned

Um. Perpendicular lines intersect at some point.

Parallel lines never touch, maybe that’s a better geometric analogy.

Of course, for most people things that are “parallel” would seem to be in close agreement.

> Um. Perpendicular lines intersect at some point.

Unless you are trying to screw your loyal users in 3 or more dimensions which seems to be the case here

  • > Unless you are trying to screw your loyal users in 3 or more dimensions which seems to be the case here

    That made me chuckle ... good one

> Parallel lines never touch, maybe that’s a better geometric analogy.

I do believe the OP meant to say that the incentives are orthogonal (i.e., misaligned, or 90deg to each other), and perpendicularly misaligned is a close fit.

Not sure why folks felt you should be downvoted for an heartfelt comment, an explanation is a much better feedback. Downvotes are counterproductive, IMO, if you're trying to have a debate or come to a meeting of minds, so I almost never use them anymore, except for where I detect ill-intentions.