← Back to context

Comment by riffraff

1 day ago

I hadn't heard of this china regulation.

Perhaps we will have a "Beijing regulatory effect" positively impacting the world like the Bruxelles and California ones.

Already happening, best example is worldwide grounding of Boeing 737 MAX. It was China who triggered it, not US authorities (protecting US corporation).

Similar thing with batteries on airplanes, tube trains, ferries and underground garages. China cares about fire hazard, other countries care about ideology.

  • > other countries care about ideology

    Not even ideology anymore, see US. Democratic country has been attacked in a biggest war since WW2, and they've decided to halt all support and attack Iran instead.

  • China, famous for never putting ideology over policy.

    • unless you're going back to the cultural revolution, modern China is extremely pragmatic. It's a nominally socialist country that runs deregulated special economic zones with tens of millions of people and more economic competition than anywhere else.

      The equivalent would be if the US started to run a socialist planned city of 15 million people somewhere, just for the sake of it. There's pretty much no other place that in the last 30-40 years has as much of a spread of policy experimentation as China has had.

  • Too bad they don't care so much about factory worker safety or slave labor

    • I don't think the bake-off to decide which superpower has the worst human rights record is going to land where you want it to. Hint, they both suck.

      FWIW, I'll take the one not dropping bombs to keep their BFF happy, boosting right-wing shitheads, threatening to invade their real allies and slapping dumb tariffs on everyone.

      1 reply →

  • Wow, that's amazing. What fire hazard are they preventing in their support for Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine?

It’s funny you say that because the China “anti regulatory effect” of the 90s-2000s also had a great impact on quality of life for the world in its own way