← Back to context

Comment by analog8374

18 hours ago

He's suggesting that there are several flavors of blindness going around so if we're going to point fingers then we might start with ourselves.

...which is a blatant false equivalence, to be clear.

  • Matthew 7:3–5

    I am not religious, but this quote keeps coming up... And people keep forgetting about it.

    • Yeah I was sorta thinking in that direction too.

      First take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye

    • Keep going. Look at Matthew 7:6. "Do not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, lest they trample them underfoot and turn to attack you."

      That is (in this context), don't bother trying to give truth (or even have a reasonable conversation) with those who simply will not listen. Zealots, shill, propagandists... it's like talking to a brick wall. If anyone has a technique for getting them to stop being a brick wall and start actually engaging with what you're saying, I'd like to know what it is.

      You can call it "transmit only mode" (hat tip Patrick McClure). When you realize that the person you're talking to is in transmit only mode, you understand how the conversation is going to go if you continue it.

  • I think it's a pretty good equivalence, actually. And pretty good advice. Passionate certainty should raise a red flag.

    • i find that passionate certainty can be a good thing in some cases, especially when someone really does know what they are talking about.

      but fanaticism is more often a problem than not. fanatics tend to not really understand what they're talking about, or twist it to fit what they want it to be about.

      > Fanaticism: Excessive enthusiasm, unreasoning zeal, or wild and extravagant notions, on any subject, especially religion, politics or ideology; religious frenzy.

      note -- not talking about any particular "thing" here. just commenting about passion vs. fanaticism in general.

      2 replies →

    • The equivalence between supporting the rights of oppressed minorities, and inciting violence towards foreigners, is a good one?