← Back to context

Comment by gizajob

2 hours ago

Feed all this into your LLM. I’m not here to type just for your benefit.

And going back to my first point, you seem to believe you’re at some kind of innovative cutting edge when your comments about the lack of proof in human subjectivity show you’re quite a long way from contemporary currents within epistemology which is why I had such lols from it - you accused Wittgenstein of being outdated while expressing a belief that would have been state of the art in about 1700.

The rest of what you’ve exasperated about is fairly scattergun so would take too much typing to engage with.

> Feed all this into your LLM. I’m not here to type just for your benefit.

Then you can just not talk and walk away. I type for your benefit you don’t type for mine this debate is one sided. No point for anyone to discuss anything with you.

> The rest of what you’ve exasperated about is fairly scattergun so would take too much typing to engage with.

Is it? Well most of your argument was stupid. But I still took the time to educate your rude ass. Let’s just end it. I’m sick of people like you who instead of engaging I good faith tell the person to fuck off till 2046. I won’t be back but wait until 2046 you’ll eat your words prick.