← Back to context

Comment by eru

14 hours ago

> Similarly, would you close schools, because they didnt make enough money?

Yes, of course. We should separate school and state.

> Airlines are highly subsidized anyway, treating them as regulated utilities falls short of taking public ownership as public institutions, where services just cost money/subsidies.

How are they highly subsidized? And where? Perhaps we should fix that, instead of adding to the problem? Two wrongs don't make a right.

You'd force an entire generation of children to simply not be educated?

  • No, why? I didn't say that we want to outlaw education.

    Though I admit heavily taxing education on account of negative externalities is tempting.

  • > "Today I learned that a new account starts getting rate limited upon receiving its first downvote. Yay?"

    Your comments are one-line thoughtless mic-drops, the system is working.

    > "If a service cannot be provided for a cost below what someone will pay, the service should not be provided as providing that service is a lose-lose situation."

    It can be a win-win situation, not everything is about profit. See also:

    > "How did poor people who needed to fly fly when flying was expensive?"

    If a poor person can fly somewhere to get a better job, they stop being a poor person. That's a win for them personally, and a win for society, and a win for future government tax income. It's also a win for the airline which moved them and got paid for it. The only time it's not a win is if you have a myopic focus on "but it costs money now and that's bad".