Comment by RobotToaster
7 hours ago
It reads to me like English isn't his first language. Either way the complexities of open source licensing are something a lot of people don't understand.
7 hours ago
It reads to me like English isn't his first language. Either way the complexities of open source licensing are something a lot of people don't understand.
As stated multiple times in the linked discussion: the licensing of the open source code is not the issue. It's the use of the trademark, and making their fork look like an officially endorsed one.
And the fork author was given a oppertunity to remediate without further drama. Instead, the fork author doubled down, where the possible reasons for that behavior are hard to interpret in good faith.
Ironic this comment reads like you didn’t even grok the basics of the issue if you think open source licensing is the source of confusion.
[flagged]
There's a term for making conclusions about someone based on their race.
1. It's not a race, make your terminology straight
2. I'm not even making a generalization. I'm pointing out an interesting fact in the context of blatant violation of internationally established behavioral norms, and even laws in sone jurisdictions
3. I'm offering you to make your own conclusion
So based on 1, 2, 3, you are welcome to gtfo.
2 replies →
[dead]