← Back to context Comment by monooso 3 hours ago In what way is this statue state sanctioned? 4 comments monooso Reply declan_roberts 2 hours ago It's on display in downtown London dude. Also who do you think paid for it? monooso 1 hour ago It was erected surreptitiously in the dead of night. That does not imply state approval.As for who paid for it, I don't know, possibly the extremely successful and wealthy artist who created it.If you have any evidence to the contrary, by all means present it. gib444 22 minutes ago It not being taken down yet implies state approval (4 days now?). It's on Pall Mall ffs, right near a statue of a KingIt's not like the wealthiest city in the UK is lacking in resources to do something about it. tim333 1 hour ago It's not government funded or planned. Although the establishment seems to like it unlike that one on the law courts.
declan_roberts 2 hours ago It's on display in downtown London dude. Also who do you think paid for it? monooso 1 hour ago It was erected surreptitiously in the dead of night. That does not imply state approval.As for who paid for it, I don't know, possibly the extremely successful and wealthy artist who created it.If you have any evidence to the contrary, by all means present it. gib444 22 minutes ago It not being taken down yet implies state approval (4 days now?). It's on Pall Mall ffs, right near a statue of a KingIt's not like the wealthiest city in the UK is lacking in resources to do something about it. tim333 1 hour ago It's not government funded or planned. Although the establishment seems to like it unlike that one on the law courts.
monooso 1 hour ago It was erected surreptitiously in the dead of night. That does not imply state approval.As for who paid for it, I don't know, possibly the extremely successful and wealthy artist who created it.If you have any evidence to the contrary, by all means present it. gib444 22 minutes ago It not being taken down yet implies state approval (4 days now?). It's on Pall Mall ffs, right near a statue of a KingIt's not like the wealthiest city in the UK is lacking in resources to do something about it.
gib444 22 minutes ago It not being taken down yet implies state approval (4 days now?). It's on Pall Mall ffs, right near a statue of a KingIt's not like the wealthiest city in the UK is lacking in resources to do something about it.
tim333 1 hour ago It's not government funded or planned. Although the establishment seems to like it unlike that one on the law courts.
It's on display in downtown London dude. Also who do you think paid for it?
It was erected surreptitiously in the dead of night. That does not imply state approval.
As for who paid for it, I don't know, possibly the extremely successful and wealthy artist who created it.
If you have any evidence to the contrary, by all means present it.
It not being taken down yet implies state approval (4 days now?). It's on Pall Mall ffs, right near a statue of a King
It's not like the wealthiest city in the UK is lacking in resources to do something about it.
It's not government funded or planned. Although the establishment seems to like it unlike that one on the law courts.