Comment by jmull
5 months ago
I think there's a significant chance this fake Notepad++ for Mac is/becomes a vector for malware.
The author is impossibly naive. The best interpretation is they are easy dupes for a supply-chain attack.
Hopefully the word gets around that no one should install this (whether or not the author of the fake version eventually finishes "evolving the branding" of the port).
Too bad MacRumors didn't bother doing more than adding a note to where they recommended this fake copy: https://www.macrumors.com/2026/04/29/notepad-plus-plus-edito...
They didn't even bother removing the links!
MacRumors has now just posted another post about the controversy: https://www.macrumors.com/2026/05/04/notepad-plus-plus-trade...
MacRumors repeated Letov's "in coordination with" bs.
There's no coordination.
Isn't notepad++ also a vector for malware? It would seem to be more of a violation of the trademark to not distribute malware
You're arguing the malware risk from notepad++ created and run by Don Ho for over 22 years is comparable to that of new, fake notepad++, vibe coded and run by a guy whose main claim to fame is a marked ignorance of norms around software development?
You'll have to let us know how you reached that conclusion.
Seriously your argument is this? Not even 3 months have passed since this [1] happened?
https://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/v889-released/
It's open source
https://github.com/nextpad-plus-plus/nextpad-plus-plus-macos