← Back to context

Comment by Onavo

11 days ago

If we are gonna go down that rabbit hole, then the natural conclusion is Haskell.

How good are LLMs at understanding Haskell errors and then dealing with them?

The last time I had a go with Haskell, the errors reminded me so much of hellish terminal compilers from the 80s and 90s that I quickly gave up. Been there, not doing that again.

Which seems pretty reasonable tbh. Claude Code is amazing with Elm in my experience.