← Back to context Comment by iewjj 21 hours ago Nope If anything firms are pulling back (I know someone closely who works at blackrock). 9 comments iewjj Reply semiquaver 21 hours ago I don’t just know someone who works in finance, I am someone who works in finance and I say you’re wrong. iewjj 21 hours ago [flagged] infecto 21 hours ago Let’s state the obvious. You have an account that was just created. Are posting specific details internal to a company with what is typically a biased area. And now throwing vulgarities out. No credibility. 2 replies → kx_x 13 hours ago In what context?For research and theses evaluations, we're observing that firms - of names we all know - are bullish and even eager to try AI products.Regarding automated asset management and the likes, indeed there's much more apprehension. biophysboy 21 hours ago pulling back as in setting more realistic token budgets, or something more drastic? I'm curious iewjj 21 hours ago Stopped using them altogether in the context of productivity - in essence they’re useless. roughly 21 hours ago I can believe that. Gambler’s Ruin gets costly when you’ve actually got money on the line.
semiquaver 21 hours ago I don’t just know someone who works in finance, I am someone who works in finance and I say you’re wrong. iewjj 21 hours ago [flagged] infecto 21 hours ago Let’s state the obvious. You have an account that was just created. Are posting specific details internal to a company with what is typically a biased area. And now throwing vulgarities out. No credibility. 2 replies →
iewjj 21 hours ago [flagged] infecto 21 hours ago Let’s state the obvious. You have an account that was just created. Are posting specific details internal to a company with what is typically a biased area. And now throwing vulgarities out. No credibility. 2 replies →
infecto 21 hours ago Let’s state the obvious. You have an account that was just created. Are posting specific details internal to a company with what is typically a biased area. And now throwing vulgarities out. No credibility. 2 replies →
kx_x 13 hours ago In what context?For research and theses evaluations, we're observing that firms - of names we all know - are bullish and even eager to try AI products.Regarding automated asset management and the likes, indeed there's much more apprehension.
biophysboy 21 hours ago pulling back as in setting more realistic token budgets, or something more drastic? I'm curious iewjj 21 hours ago Stopped using them altogether in the context of productivity - in essence they’re useless. roughly 21 hours ago I can believe that. Gambler’s Ruin gets costly when you’ve actually got money on the line.
iewjj 21 hours ago Stopped using them altogether in the context of productivity - in essence they’re useless. roughly 21 hours ago I can believe that. Gambler’s Ruin gets costly when you’ve actually got money on the line.
roughly 21 hours ago I can believe that. Gambler’s Ruin gets costly when you’ve actually got money on the line.
I don’t just know someone who works in finance, I am someone who works in finance and I say you’re wrong.
[flagged]
Let’s state the obvious. You have an account that was just created. Are posting specific details internal to a company with what is typically a biased area. And now throwing vulgarities out. No credibility.
2 replies →
In what context?
For research and theses evaluations, we're observing that firms - of names we all know - are bullish and even eager to try AI products.
Regarding automated asset management and the likes, indeed there's much more apprehension.
pulling back as in setting more realistic token budgets, or something more drastic? I'm curious
Stopped using them altogether in the context of productivity - in essence they’re useless.
I can believe that. Gambler’s Ruin gets costly when you’ve actually got money on the line.