← Back to context Comment by xboxnolifes 20 hours ago Farmers are literally subsidized to over-produce for food security. 4 comments xboxnolifes Reply hnthrow0287345 20 hours ago Which of course is not enough due to other expenses:https://www.fb.org/market-intel/farm-bankruptcies-continued-...https://www.adamsandreese.com/the-ledger/rising-farm-distres...And those farms get bought up and folded into for-profit operations. You simply can't fix this in the current system. JumpCrisscross 18 hours ago > for food securityThey overproduce for votes. Countries without farmer blocks swinging elections stockpile non-perishables for food security. xboxnolifes 15 hours ago For both. With or without the voting block, they still serve the purpose of over-producing. JumpCrisscross 15 hours ago > With or without the voting block, they still serve the purpose of over-producingOverproduction is the method. Food security the aim. If they weren’t a swing voting block, the overproduction loses purpose.
hnthrow0287345 20 hours ago Which of course is not enough due to other expenses:https://www.fb.org/market-intel/farm-bankruptcies-continued-...https://www.adamsandreese.com/the-ledger/rising-farm-distres...And those farms get bought up and folded into for-profit operations. You simply can't fix this in the current system.
JumpCrisscross 18 hours ago > for food securityThey overproduce for votes. Countries without farmer blocks swinging elections stockpile non-perishables for food security. xboxnolifes 15 hours ago For both. With or without the voting block, they still serve the purpose of over-producing. JumpCrisscross 15 hours ago > With or without the voting block, they still serve the purpose of over-producingOverproduction is the method. Food security the aim. If they weren’t a swing voting block, the overproduction loses purpose.
xboxnolifes 15 hours ago For both. With or without the voting block, they still serve the purpose of over-producing. JumpCrisscross 15 hours ago > With or without the voting block, they still serve the purpose of over-producingOverproduction is the method. Food security the aim. If they weren’t a swing voting block, the overproduction loses purpose.
JumpCrisscross 15 hours ago > With or without the voting block, they still serve the purpose of over-producingOverproduction is the method. Food security the aim. If they weren’t a swing voting block, the overproduction loses purpose.
Which of course is not enough due to other expenses:
https://www.fb.org/market-intel/farm-bankruptcies-continued-...
https://www.adamsandreese.com/the-ledger/rising-farm-distres...
And those farms get bought up and folded into for-profit operations. You simply can't fix this in the current system.
> for food security
They overproduce for votes. Countries without farmer blocks swinging elections stockpile non-perishables for food security.
For both. With or without the voting block, they still serve the purpose of over-producing.
> With or without the voting block, they still serve the purpose of over-producing
Overproduction is the method. Food security the aim. If they weren’t a swing voting block, the overproduction loses purpose.