← Back to context Comment by strange_quark 17 hours ago Organized labor 3 comments strange_quark Reply shaewest 17 hours ago History has always been kind to inefficient systems organizing together for protection /s wiseowise 16 hours ago Efficient system is when worker does work of 5 people for the same salary and CEO makes billions. shaewest 16 hours ago I'm not arguing what defines inefficient in these situations, just that "if we group together we'll be okay" for tech workers will go about as well as 1960's longshoreman unionization
shaewest 17 hours ago History has always been kind to inefficient systems organizing together for protection /s wiseowise 16 hours ago Efficient system is when worker does work of 5 people for the same salary and CEO makes billions. shaewest 16 hours ago I'm not arguing what defines inefficient in these situations, just that "if we group together we'll be okay" for tech workers will go about as well as 1960's longshoreman unionization
wiseowise 16 hours ago Efficient system is when worker does work of 5 people for the same salary and CEO makes billions. shaewest 16 hours ago I'm not arguing what defines inefficient in these situations, just that "if we group together we'll be okay" for tech workers will go about as well as 1960's longshoreman unionization
shaewest 16 hours ago I'm not arguing what defines inefficient in these situations, just that "if we group together we'll be okay" for tech workers will go about as well as 1960's longshoreman unionization
History has always been kind to inefficient systems organizing together for protection /s
Efficient system is when worker does work of 5 people for the same salary and CEO makes billions.
I'm not arguing what defines inefficient in these situations, just that "if we group together we'll be okay" for tech workers will go about as well as 1960's longshoreman unionization