← Back to context Comment by hdgvhicv 8 hours ago Why would you have to “review a pr or issue”?You can choose toOr you can choose to ignore them 7 comments hdgvhicv Reply DANmode 8 hours ago All of them?Why are you on a platform open to accepting them in the first place?Are we talking about the same thing? seba_dos1 7 hours ago Yes, all of them if you want to. It's 100% up to you whether and how you deal with other people and their contributions, and it's completely orthogonal to being FLOSS or using a git hosting. josephg 5 hours ago The central freedom provided by opensource software maintainers is the fork button. Not the “merge pull request” button.Git hosting provides discoverability and the ability to fork repositories. Everything else is an optional feature. DANmode 6 hours ago Then the thread feels a little tangential,because you don’t have to “drive a hard line”, to do that,you just draw it once (publish a no PR policy, don’t host on GH, etc),and you shouldn’t be hearing from users. 3 replies →
DANmode 8 hours ago All of them?Why are you on a platform open to accepting them in the first place?Are we talking about the same thing? seba_dos1 7 hours ago Yes, all of them if you want to. It's 100% up to you whether and how you deal with other people and their contributions, and it's completely orthogonal to being FLOSS or using a git hosting. josephg 5 hours ago The central freedom provided by opensource software maintainers is the fork button. Not the “merge pull request” button.Git hosting provides discoverability and the ability to fork repositories. Everything else is an optional feature. DANmode 6 hours ago Then the thread feels a little tangential,because you don’t have to “drive a hard line”, to do that,you just draw it once (publish a no PR policy, don’t host on GH, etc),and you shouldn’t be hearing from users. 3 replies →
seba_dos1 7 hours ago Yes, all of them if you want to. It's 100% up to you whether and how you deal with other people and their contributions, and it's completely orthogonal to being FLOSS or using a git hosting. josephg 5 hours ago The central freedom provided by opensource software maintainers is the fork button. Not the “merge pull request” button.Git hosting provides discoverability and the ability to fork repositories. Everything else is an optional feature. DANmode 6 hours ago Then the thread feels a little tangential,because you don’t have to “drive a hard line”, to do that,you just draw it once (publish a no PR policy, don’t host on GH, etc),and you shouldn’t be hearing from users. 3 replies →
josephg 5 hours ago The central freedom provided by opensource software maintainers is the fork button. Not the “merge pull request” button.Git hosting provides discoverability and the ability to fork repositories. Everything else is an optional feature.
DANmode 6 hours ago Then the thread feels a little tangential,because you don’t have to “drive a hard line”, to do that,you just draw it once (publish a no PR policy, don’t host on GH, etc),and you shouldn’t be hearing from users. 3 replies →
All of them?
Why are you on a platform open to accepting them in the first place?
Are we talking about the same thing?
Yes, all of them if you want to. It's 100% up to you whether and how you deal with other people and their contributions, and it's completely orthogonal to being FLOSS or using a git hosting.
The central freedom provided by opensource software maintainers is the fork button. Not the “merge pull request” button.
Git hosting provides discoverability and the ability to fork repositories. Everything else is an optional feature.
Then the thread feels a little tangential,
because you don’t have to “drive a hard line”, to do that,
you just draw it once (publish a no PR policy, don’t host on GH, etc),
and you shouldn’t be hearing from users.
3 replies →