Comment by ex-aws-dude

I don't understand what you mean by the last point

If I generate code with an agent and review it and iterate back and forth until the quality is as high as I would write myself, the end result is no different

I'm still in control of holding it to the same quality level?

With agentic coding there is still a human reviewing the code, that's the main difference from vibe-coding

The rules are just to try to guide it and save iteration time but there is no illusion that they are actual hard rules since everything is statistical.

> Such paradigm assumes that LLMs are perfect reliable super accurate rule followers

That's the whole reason we're not vibe-coding, we are well aware of that.