Your post literally suggests that a customer spontaneously should kiss the employee. That kind of behavior is goes far beyond an innocent facade of "free hugs."
Consent is involved, everyone is a volunteer and willing participant. If you don’t want a hug or kiss or whatever you don’t get one. I fail to understand how this makes it anything but “free hugs”
Are you somehow operating under the impression that volunteers are being held against their will and forced to give and/or receive free kisses to anyone who demands it?
That might be the worst take I've ever read on this website.
It's just free hugs, but more theatrical.
Your post literally suggests that a customer spontaneously should kiss the employee. That kind of behavior is goes far beyond an innocent facade of "free hugs."
Consent is involved, everyone is a volunteer and willing participant. If you don’t want a hug or kiss or whatever you don’t get one. I fail to understand how this makes it anything but “free hugs”
Doesn't the post read that it's the server who would give you the kiss, if you compliment them three times?
Also, volunteer is not the same as employee. Especially important in this context.
2 replies →
Are you somehow operating under the impression that volunteers are being held against their will and forced to give and/or receive free kisses to anyone who demands it?
Are you okay?
2 replies →
Something's either literally stated or suggested. It can't be both, but it can be neither.
What is wrong with you. This isn’t a customer/employee thing at all. That’s, like, the entire point of Burning Man.
1 reply →
...you ask. Just like you would for the spanking.