← Back to context

Comment by gucci-on-fleek

11 hours ago

I've never used Canvas before, but all the LMSes that I've used allow students to enable emails whenever anything is updated, including when grades are posted. This is off by default because it's often 10+ emails a day, because many teachers post notes once a day, and with 5 classes, that adds up pretty quick. I personally have it enabled because it's pretty manageable with some custom Outlook rules, but setting this up is well beyond the capabilities of most students.

Canvas will send emails when grades are posted, but not what the grade is. Or at least that’s the way in the configurations I’ve seen. So, that wouldn’t help in a case where no one can access the canvas gradebook.

  • yup you just get an email saying "A new grade has been posted for EECS 420"

    • ...then all those clicks juice engagement and utilization numbers; why would someone want to just know their grade when they can use more clicks and custom apps to get the same info? </s>

      The party line is probably something about "a lack of data security" with email, which would almost be funny given the current situation if it wasn't so stressful for those impacted...

      6 replies →

  > setting this up is well beyond the capabilities of most students.

Setting up custom email filters is beyond the capabilities of most students? What are they learning? Where will they be qualified to work?

  • You know that most students aren't computer science majors?

    Have you met the average community college student who doesn't even own a laptop but does all of their work on their phone? Gmail doesn't even allow you to create or manage filters from their phone app or mobile web interface.

  • Most of my students, across all disciplines, don't have basic competence in Word or GDocs, software they've been using for years. It's weeks to teach them how to appy headings

  • > Where will they be qualified to work?

    Going by a certain story 2 years ago, their concern should be that they're overqualified for Meta.

    It doesn't help that gmail, which is the only serious direct competition to outlook, straight up doesn't do "folders" and instead goes with markers. So you can't really just put a filter that drags all the 100 low-priority alerts in what would count as a first degree abstraction of "place where things are sorted into". No, there are two layers of abstraction between point A and B of things, sorter and sorted things. The result? Muggles can't recognize the heck you're describing and refuse to even acknowledge the possibility.

    • > It doesn't help that gmail, which is the only serious direct competition to outlook, straight up doesn't do "folders" and instead goes with markers.

      While true, unless I'm mistaken, markers (I assume you're referring to tags) can be nested to provide a pseudo-folder hierarchy, and with proper filters you can remove the "inbox" tag and have the mail only show up under the specific tag.

      TBH I don't fully mind it, it lets you classify an email in multiple ways (eg "See Later" as well as "Work related").

      3 replies →

    • I partially solve this by using Thunderbird on my laptop. When I get emails on my smartphone (on the Gmail app), they unfortunately all go to the inbox. But the moment I open Thunderbird, it nicely organizes them for me.

      1 reply →

    • Gmail still has perfectly functional filters that can be set to auto-apply a label and skip the inbox. They may be called "labels" now, but they still function just as they did when the UI called them "folders"

    • If a CS graduate can't figure out some simple gmail labels and filters then they should not be awarded that degree. Plain and simple. It's not rocket science.

      3 replies →

  • This is a brilliant reply. I shook my head at the original and laughed hard at your perfectly reasonable question.

    It reminds me of an old joke my father used to say about jobs with virtually no interview (fast food, etc). He called it "The Mirror Test", as in if you hold a mirror up to the person, does it fog up? If yes, you are hired!

  • I have been using email for as long as email was a thing and I still managed to blackhole important emails with filters not too long ago.

  • Anywhere. I straight up don’t check my email at work. If people need me they have to teams message me to tell me they emailed me. Don’t have time to sift through all the bullshit generated emails. Jira, GitHub, confluence, servicenow, workday, etc. amounts to an incredible amount of junk I just can’t be bothered with.

  • > What are they learning?

    Are you suggesting that outlook wrangling be explicitly taught at the college level?

  • Most managers I've met, struggle with setting up email filters, and have to ask tech support to do it for them. These students will be qualified just fine.

  • I'd hope/assume that any Computer Science students would be able to do this, but most Biology/Education/English/Art students probably couldn't.

    I mean, anyone smart enough to attend university could probably figure it out if they really wanted to, but there are hundreds of other useful things that they could learn too. There are only so many hours in the day, and given that most students don't get that many emails, I can hardly blame them for not wanting to prioritize learning how to filter emails.

    (I personally have over a hundred lines of Sieve filters, but I'm definitely not a typical student)

  • In my experience, it’s hard enough to make students check their school email in the first place. Let alone filter it.

    • As a ugrad, and later a PhD student teaching, everything is explained the first day. If you can figure it out you just fail the class (or go to office hrs to get help, etc).

  • Didn't you hear? Chat apps and iMessage (SMS included) is the new email.

    Delete

    Delete and Report Spam

  • >Setting up custom email filters is beyond the capabilities of most students?

    Yes. And most of the general population. They can do it once they know it exists, most people just are not aware it is a thing at all.

    >What are they learning?

    Here, their "major" as you say in the US. Someone in econ, biology or even CS is not going to learn Outlook rules. Maybe IT or business will have a sentence on it.

    >Where will they be qualified to work?

    Any office job. Any job really.

  • > What are they learning?

    Exactly what is in their field of study, nothing more. That's a huge part of the problems created by treating academia as a degree mill mandatory to get a job able to feed yourself instead of a place only for those truly interested in actually studying a subject.