← Back to context Comment by nitsky 21 hours ago True, but it makes the specific collision the post observed completely impossible. 7 comments nitsky Reply stanmancan 21 hours ago I left a more detailed comment on the parent, but it's definitely not impossible! ryanmonroe 20 hours ago The scenario in this post is that the first uuid was created one year before the duplicate uuid. That isn’t possible with v7 ffsm8 20 hours ago You're heavily leaning on "collision like this" to relate to the exact time stamps for your statement to be true.It's equality possible to interpret the "like this" to the collision itself, without a focus on the 1 year distance between the creation dates.So I guess both views are valid. 2 replies → stanmancan 18 hours ago The scenario being the collision itself, the time period isn’t particularly relevant aside from it occurring much quicker than expected. JamesSwift 20 hours ago Surely the scenario where he generates the same number of items as he did between 2025 and now, but did it in 1 tick of v7 UUIDs also runs into it?
stanmancan 21 hours ago I left a more detailed comment on the parent, but it's definitely not impossible! ryanmonroe 20 hours ago The scenario in this post is that the first uuid was created one year before the duplicate uuid. That isn’t possible with v7 ffsm8 20 hours ago You're heavily leaning on "collision like this" to relate to the exact time stamps for your statement to be true.It's equality possible to interpret the "like this" to the collision itself, without a focus on the 1 year distance between the creation dates.So I guess both views are valid. 2 replies → stanmancan 18 hours ago The scenario being the collision itself, the time period isn’t particularly relevant aside from it occurring much quicker than expected. JamesSwift 20 hours ago Surely the scenario where he generates the same number of items as he did between 2025 and now, but did it in 1 tick of v7 UUIDs also runs into it?
ryanmonroe 20 hours ago The scenario in this post is that the first uuid was created one year before the duplicate uuid. That isn’t possible with v7 ffsm8 20 hours ago You're heavily leaning on "collision like this" to relate to the exact time stamps for your statement to be true.It's equality possible to interpret the "like this" to the collision itself, without a focus on the 1 year distance between the creation dates.So I guess both views are valid. 2 replies → stanmancan 18 hours ago The scenario being the collision itself, the time period isn’t particularly relevant aside from it occurring much quicker than expected. JamesSwift 20 hours ago Surely the scenario where he generates the same number of items as he did between 2025 and now, but did it in 1 tick of v7 UUIDs also runs into it?
ffsm8 20 hours ago You're heavily leaning on "collision like this" to relate to the exact time stamps for your statement to be true.It's equality possible to interpret the "like this" to the collision itself, without a focus on the 1 year distance between the creation dates.So I guess both views are valid. 2 replies →
stanmancan 18 hours ago The scenario being the collision itself, the time period isn’t particularly relevant aside from it occurring much quicker than expected.
JamesSwift 20 hours ago Surely the scenario where he generates the same number of items as he did between 2025 and now, but did it in 1 tick of v7 UUIDs also runs into it?
I left a more detailed comment on the parent, but it's definitely not impossible!
The scenario in this post is that the first uuid was created one year before the duplicate uuid. That isn’t possible with v7
You're heavily leaning on "collision like this" to relate to the exact time stamps for your statement to be true.
It's equality possible to interpret the "like this" to the collision itself, without a focus on the 1 year distance between the creation dates.
So I guess both views are valid.
2 replies →
The scenario being the collision itself, the time period isn’t particularly relevant aside from it occurring much quicker than expected.
Surely the scenario where he generates the same number of items as he did between 2025 and now, but did it in 1 tick of v7 UUIDs also runs into it?