Comment by crazygringo

Me.

I think the idea is sad and tragic, but also that we are at the point where we have no choice but to do something.

AI/LLM's have created a vector for abuse that previous tools are failing to protect against, and the problem is only getting worse.

I'm sick of the increase of LLM slop on websites in comments and posts. I'm sick of how fraud and spam and abuse can be increasingly automated in ways current tools can't catch. I'm sick of hosting costs exploding as hobby websites get hammered for no reason.

I don't realistically see any alternative but for some kind of reliable signal that a web request is most likely coming from a real person (not a perfect guarantee, but something good enough). Which means some kind of attestation that it's a real hardware device that costs at least a few bucks and is making human-level numbers of requests (not millions per day), or else some kind of digital ID attestation system.

And I much prefer device attestation that keeps you personally anonymous, as opposed to identity attestation that will inevitably allow the government to track your browsing.

So this seems like the lesser evil. If there are other ideas I'm very open to them as well, but I basically see something like this as a sadly necessary and inevitable evil. Something is necessary and this is less worse than the alternatives. And the fact that website owners choose whether to enable this or not means that those who want to keep an internet open to all devices and web requests can do so, if they're willing to handle the additional costs in handling abuse.