← Back to context

Comment by marshray

12 hours ago

Conspicuously missing in your argument is a link to a credible source with any evidence (or even 1st person testimony). It should be easy.

Instead, I just see elaborate narratives about political motivations and garbage evidence like that laughably low-effort fake video presented in Congress by Representatives.

Lol, what? Reads as zany non-sequitur in context - did you reply right? Your frame that any timing of this drop is disputed and requires evidence, I reject. If you say precisely which phrases you felt that about, your comment might be better.

  • Oh, you were joking?

    Sorry, I encounter someone who believes exactly what you wrote at least once a week.