← Back to context

Comment by rafaelmn

5 days ago

If anything LLMs should use something higher level because it compresses the context and makes programming closer to natural language they are trained on.

Forcing LLMs to do a shitty job of what a compiler can do deterministically is not a good approach IMO.

Low level was the wrong term for me to pick there. I was meaning more along the lines of "purpose built". I.e. I could see a language, potentially still an abstraction requiring a compiler, that isn't meant to be particularly meaningful or inspectable by humans. For LLMs your right, conciseness would be important and that would likely mean it would be compiled.