← Back to context

Comment by techteach00

2 days ago

I respectfully disagree with "they calculate in the fact of that lack of control into their purchase decision".

The average person is not calculating anything but price, is it what everyone else is using, is it new etc. Very low level calculations. They aren't asking "can I install applications from outside the app store?". Etc.

The average person is also being constantly manipulated to believe things which are actively nefarious are actually good for them.

I don’t know if we can blame the average person when there is an entire class of people which have almost limitless resources, knowledge and means to execute their agenda. At some point we have to accept we are fighting against an evil and powerful enemy. And that the masses are high succeptible

It’s like being mad at the characters in lord of the rings for succumbing to the rings powers

Hrrm. It seems your original comment has been heavily edited.

> They aren't asking "can I install applications from outside the app store?"

I agree. They don't want to. They already can't begin to evaluate app trustworthiness and don't want to have to. And they shouldn't have to. Yet they live in a world where they do. So they lean on reputation, app store filtering, the legal system, and hope.

  • > I agree. They don't want to.

    That's not what the parent was saying. Most people don't have any opinion whatsoever on sideloading. You can go confirm this for yourself by asking a Mac or PC owner how scary it is. Most of them will respond that they genuinely never thought about it, not that they're afraid to consider it. To these people, it's a normal feature of their device that you could never remove.

    The parent is lamenting that people don't care about this technology - Client Side Scanning, hardware attestation, Push notification surveillance - all of it is enabled not because of fear, but apathy.

    > And they shouldn't have to. Yet they live in a world where they do.

    This is fearmongering logic that doesn't really defend the App Store. Putting your faith in a centralized software auditor also requires you to pay attention and stay abreast of scams. It's just a different exploit chain to deliver the same payloads: https://blog.lastpass.com/posts/warning-fraudulent-app-imper...

    • I do talk to computer users and they do fear making installations. Many of them have installed something that was adware or a virus, often without meaning to and regretted the results. I have been helping my family and extended family members fix their errors for a long time. This pushes them to big names with names to spoil.

      I suspect that the GP is, as you write, lamenting the lack of attention to the topic.

      > This is fearmongering logic that doesn't really defend the App Store

      I agree it doesn't defend the app store. It wasn't about the app store at all. It is about the social problem of the persistent existence of people who choose to purposely do others harm. The problem for most people isn't the app store but those who attempt to get exploits and quasi-exploits into the app stores.

      I also agree that you still have to be cautious when using the app stores. Are you claiming that the app store controls do nothing to reduce the presence of malicious apps in their stores? The article you link starts by noting that the app was removed the day after that post was made. That is exactly why people feel more comfortable using the app store.

      2 replies →