Comment by voxl
9 days ago
This is the kind of commentary that is completely detached from reality: people want housing, people want food, people want gas.
It's not great that we can buy iphones (and AI is going to cause all electronics to be scarce, so much for abundance there)
I'm confused. It seems the parent comment is saying AI proliferation could make cost of goods drop orders of magnitude and you say it's detached from reality because people don't want goods, they want housing food and gas?
Housing food and gas are goods...
Or did you mean something completely different?
Did you try reading their second paragraph? The one where they claim we already have an abundance of said goods?
Yes they said "relative superabundance". Relative to history there is an abundance of most good and services (including food and housing).
As a Gen Z or Gen A I'm sure it doesn't feel this way, but that's mostly because they are comparing themselves to what they see on social media instead of comparing themselves to how people actually lived 100 years ago, or how people in developing nations lived 20 years ago.
I think point the OP was making is that as we grow abundance people will still be miserable because as expectations rise satisfaction falls. Also most people are susceptible to envy, and the more stuff there is the more statistically likely it is to be distributed unevenly.
Even if the average person's circumstances improve objectively from generation to generation, people's 's instinct are to fixate on the parts of their lives theyre unsatisfied with and to compare themselves with others who are better off - leading to subjective misery.
2 replies →