← Back to context Comment by lijok 1 day ago We should all go back to writing assembly 3 comments lijok Reply 3836293648 19 hours ago > X is a terrible language because of the lack of static analysis available.> (Mocking) Yes, that's why we should go back to Y with even worse static analysis.Sure __loam 1 day ago No we should write one of the many modern programming languages that handle certain projects way better, including kotlin, go, or Java. The only things python is best in class at are scripting and as a harness for high performance c++ or fortran. lijok 21 hours ago What about the projects that python handles better?
3836293648 19 hours ago > X is a terrible language because of the lack of static analysis available.> (Mocking) Yes, that's why we should go back to Y with even worse static analysis.Sure
__loam 1 day ago No we should write one of the many modern programming languages that handle certain projects way better, including kotlin, go, or Java. The only things python is best in class at are scripting and as a harness for high performance c++ or fortran. lijok 21 hours ago What about the projects that python handles better?
> X is a terrible language because of the lack of static analysis available.
> (Mocking) Yes, that's why we should go back to Y with even worse static analysis.
Sure
No we should write one of the many modern programming languages that handle certain projects way better, including kotlin, go, or Java. The only things python is best in class at are scripting and as a harness for high performance c++ or fortran.
What about the projects that python handles better?