← Back to context

Comment by compiler-guy

18 hours ago

The thing to remember about Google and software is that consumers don't see the vast majority of the software it produces and uses, from the distributed filesystem colossus (https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/storage-data-transfer...) to an enormous number of other internal projects just as complicated as that.

It's user-facing stuff may or may not be great--and the consumer level flops are legendary--but that is only the tip of the software iceberg.

Certainly fair. But they have tried some amusingly ambitious projects that make it pretty easy to raise eyebrows. Stadia alone is enough to make me nervous on any efforts they announce that are ambitious.

  • Stadia was pretty technically awesome, and also a rounding error on Google's overall engineering budget.

    "Ambitious" engineering means something very different inside of Google. Example: Spanner. Infra Spanner is correctly described as a "generational achievement". Very few people outside of Google have any idea that it exists, or what it does, and that's fine.