← Back to context Comment by tptacek 5 months ago Seriously, your idea here is maybe you can start an Emacs vs. vi fight in the comment threads? 2 comments tptacek Reply noctuid 5 months ago No one mentioned vi, I like neovim just fine, and I'm using pi daily. Nice try though. My only point is that if you want to talk about rewriting everything yourself, NIH, churn, whatever you want to call it, Emacs is absolutely not a great example. zahlman 5 months ago > No one mentioned viBut you mentioned multiple variants thereof, in the context of a thread about Emacs.It's highly disingenuous to suppose that this doesn't count.
noctuid 5 months ago No one mentioned vi, I like neovim just fine, and I'm using pi daily. Nice try though. My only point is that if you want to talk about rewriting everything yourself, NIH, churn, whatever you want to call it, Emacs is absolutely not a great example. zahlman 5 months ago > No one mentioned viBut you mentioned multiple variants thereof, in the context of a thread about Emacs.It's highly disingenuous to suppose that this doesn't count.
zahlman 5 months ago > No one mentioned viBut you mentioned multiple variants thereof, in the context of a thread about Emacs.It's highly disingenuous to suppose that this doesn't count.
No one mentioned vi, I like neovim just fine, and I'm using pi daily. Nice try though. My only point is that if you want to talk about rewriting everything yourself, NIH, churn, whatever you want to call it, Emacs is absolutely not a great example.
> No one mentioned vi
But you mentioned multiple variants thereof, in the context of a thread about Emacs.
It's highly disingenuous to suppose that this doesn't count.