← Back to context

Comment by fc417fc802

2 hours ago

> I haven't seen any companies granting RSUs that pay a pittance in salary.

If you recognize something as wrong in principle when taken to the extreme shouldn't you also regard milder instances to be wrong as well? "Well sure, if you steal $1M that's obviously immoral but that guy only stole $100."

Of course in this case I recognize that there's quite a bit of uncertainty over how exactly the intent and representation of RSUs ought to be interpreted. I had always seen them as akin to a signing bonus but it's clear now that many people don't share that perspective.

I’ve read probably thousands of negative comments about layoffs over the years, and I don’t think any of them centered on unvested RSUs.