← Back to context Comment by cyberax 16 hours ago > Ethernet: 1 WAN Gb, 1 LAN GbReally? In 2026? Pass.It needs to be _at_ _least_ two SFP+. 7 comments cyberax Reply snvzz 14 hours ago Note that most people, worldwide, only have <1gbps internet access if at all. imtringued 2 hours ago Most people still want the option to connect more than one device and the moment they talk over the local network, having more than one gigabit is better. cyberax 13 hours ago Sigh. 1gbps is widely available, even in relatively poor countries.And if you're making a _new_ device that should last for 5-10 years, it's just stupid to use technology that is getting obsoleted even now. snvzz 13 hours ago >Sigh. 1gbps is widely available, even in relatively poor countries.No, it isn't. Not even by far.>And if you're making a _new_ device that should last for 5-10 years, it's just stupid to use technology that is getting obsoleted even now.Anything higher than 1gbps would ramp up the cost today. 3 replies →
snvzz 14 hours ago Note that most people, worldwide, only have <1gbps internet access if at all. imtringued 2 hours ago Most people still want the option to connect more than one device and the moment they talk over the local network, having more than one gigabit is better. cyberax 13 hours ago Sigh. 1gbps is widely available, even in relatively poor countries.And if you're making a _new_ device that should last for 5-10 years, it's just stupid to use technology that is getting obsoleted even now. snvzz 13 hours ago >Sigh. 1gbps is widely available, even in relatively poor countries.No, it isn't. Not even by far.>And if you're making a _new_ device that should last for 5-10 years, it's just stupid to use technology that is getting obsoleted even now.Anything higher than 1gbps would ramp up the cost today. 3 replies →
imtringued 2 hours ago Most people still want the option to connect more than one device and the moment they talk over the local network, having more than one gigabit is better.
cyberax 13 hours ago Sigh. 1gbps is widely available, even in relatively poor countries.And if you're making a _new_ device that should last for 5-10 years, it's just stupid to use technology that is getting obsoleted even now. snvzz 13 hours ago >Sigh. 1gbps is widely available, even in relatively poor countries.No, it isn't. Not even by far.>And if you're making a _new_ device that should last for 5-10 years, it's just stupid to use technology that is getting obsoleted even now.Anything higher than 1gbps would ramp up the cost today. 3 replies →
snvzz 13 hours ago >Sigh. 1gbps is widely available, even in relatively poor countries.No, it isn't. Not even by far.>And if you're making a _new_ device that should last for 5-10 years, it's just stupid to use technology that is getting obsoleted even now.Anything higher than 1gbps would ramp up the cost today. 3 replies →
Note that most people, worldwide, only have <1gbps internet access if at all.
Most people still want the option to connect more than one device and the moment they talk over the local network, having more than one gigabit is better.
Sigh. 1gbps is widely available, even in relatively poor countries.
And if you're making a _new_ device that should last for 5-10 years, it's just stupid to use technology that is getting obsoleted even now.
>Sigh. 1gbps is widely available, even in relatively poor countries.
No, it isn't. Not even by far.
>And if you're making a _new_ device that should last for 5-10 years, it's just stupid to use technology that is getting obsoleted even now.
Anything higher than 1gbps would ramp up the cost today.
3 replies →