Comment by Foivos

I just wish to anyone who is against this policy to be forced to review a paper that turns out to be unedited AI slop. Reviewers are experts volunteers who do it for free. It is incredibly frustrating to have spent 4 hours reading a paper where you try your best to make sense of what the authors are trying to prove just to realize that it is hallucinations.

The authors should value the time of the reviewers higher than their own time. So, if you include AI nonsense in your paper, it is insulting.