← Back to context

Comment by lifis

18 hours ago

[flagged]

If this rule were implemented, would you be walking free right now? Think it over.

  • Pretty sure the million dollars was not meant seriously. There are plenty of regulated fields in which people still participate, despite various risks of liability. Professional engineers, doctors, every Uber driver in the US, who could potentially be punished for negligent driving while on the job. The point, I think, is that the current level of responsibility for writing bad code is essentially zero, but should probably be higher for some applications.

    • > the current level of responsibility for writing bad code is essentially zero, but should probably be higher for some applications

      I agree that e.g. working on an OS should require guild-type credentials. But I don't know if most SWEs understand the professional-standards requirements such organisations are empowered to enforce on their members.

      1 reply →

We should roll this out for everything.

Someone T-bones you in parking lot, chef causes food poisoning, plumber's leak floods your bathroom, personal trainer pushes to injury, mislabeled allergen on food, movers break your armoire, roofer leaves a leak -- I bet we'd see a lot less of all that if a $1MM fine + life in jail loomed over everyone.

Nobody would want to do business, but boy would we be in a golden age.

> If the person who wrote this were to be imprisoned for the rest of their life [...] then things would be very different

Yes, they certainly would. You wouldn't have smartphones, for instance.

I can't tell if this is satirical or not. But there are so many takes like this recently (hold the website liable for user content, hold the corporate developer liable for zero days in a project they happened to touch) that would all result in the same outcome (no more product at all) that I can't help but wonder if there's some luddite psy-op trying desperately to bring us back to a pre-Internet era in any way they can...