← Back to context Comment by StilesCrisis 15 hours ago It's easy to be secure if you just remove features. There's obvious tension here. 5 comments StilesCrisis Reply Aachen 14 hours ago Could you be any more specific about what features they've removed such that the hardening functions work? Because I think there are none StilesCrisis 13 hours ago They're quite open about it. https://grapheneos.org/features#attack-surface-reduction mtlmtlmtlmtl 10 hours ago You said removing features. This link is talking about making certain feautures optional and disabled by default, not removing them. 2 replies →
Aachen 14 hours ago Could you be any more specific about what features they've removed such that the hardening functions work? Because I think there are none StilesCrisis 13 hours ago They're quite open about it. https://grapheneos.org/features#attack-surface-reduction mtlmtlmtlmtl 10 hours ago You said removing features. This link is talking about making certain feautures optional and disabled by default, not removing them. 2 replies →
StilesCrisis 13 hours ago They're quite open about it. https://grapheneos.org/features#attack-surface-reduction mtlmtlmtlmtl 10 hours ago You said removing features. This link is talking about making certain feautures optional and disabled by default, not removing them. 2 replies →
mtlmtlmtlmtl 10 hours ago You said removing features. This link is talking about making certain feautures optional and disabled by default, not removing them. 2 replies →
Could you be any more specific about what features they've removed such that the hardening functions work? Because I think there are none
They're quite open about it. https://grapheneos.org/features#attack-surface-reduction
You said removing features. This link is talking about making certain feautures optional and disabled by default, not removing them.
2 replies →