← Back to context Comment by treis 13 hours ago Your data shows a 20% improvement. That's $20-100k a year depending on how much devs are paid. 4 comments treis Reply baobabKoodaa 12 hours ago You just compared this AI shift to "tractors on farms". Did tractors increase farming output by 20%? treis 11 hours ago The first tractors in 1911 or whatever probably did. 50 years on and it was many times that. chadgpt3 5 hours ago You don't get paid 20% more for achieving 20% more achievement, that's for sure. watwut 12 hours ago They dont show that. They show 20% more PR. That is not the same as 20% more productivity.
baobabKoodaa 12 hours ago You just compared this AI shift to "tractors on farms". Did tractors increase farming output by 20%? treis 11 hours ago The first tractors in 1911 or whatever probably did. 50 years on and it was many times that.
treis 11 hours ago The first tractors in 1911 or whatever probably did. 50 years on and it was many times that.
chadgpt3 5 hours ago You don't get paid 20% more for achieving 20% more achievement, that's for sure.
watwut 12 hours ago They dont show that. They show 20% more PR. That is not the same as 20% more productivity.
You just compared this AI shift to "tractors on farms". Did tractors increase farming output by 20%?
The first tractors in 1911 or whatever probably did. 50 years on and it was many times that.
You don't get paid 20% more for achieving 20% more achievement, that's for sure.
They dont show that. They show 20% more PR. That is not the same as 20% more productivity.