> Rules that ask people not to use LLMs are ignored and almost impossible to enforce in open online events.
It's quite sad to see CTFs dying. I never had the time do seriously participate in CTFs, but I always respected those who did, as well as the people organizing these events.
> Rules that ask people not to use LLMs are ignored and almost impossible to enforce in open online events.
That's such a non-reason. If your competition cannot enforce the rules of the competition, then what's the point? Does the CTFs specifically need to be 'open'?
The article addresses this:
> Rules that ask people not to use LLMs are ignored and almost impossible to enforce in open online events.
It's quite sad to see CTFs dying. I never had the time do seriously participate in CTFs, but I always respected those who did, as well as the people organizing these events.
> Rules that ask people not to use LLMs are ignored and almost impossible to enforce in open online events.
That's such a non-reason. If your competition cannot enforce the rules of the competition, then what's the point? Does the CTFs specifically need to be 'open'?
I don't get your reasoning? You're agreeing with the author but are not?
The author argues that open CTFs are done for because of rampant cheating. You're agreeing with that, don't you?
The title is "AI has broken the open CTF format". If the format is "open CTF" then it is very specifically open.
As to your second question: Yeah, I believe having open CTFs was a good idea.
1 reply →