← Back to context

Comment by zakirullin

8 hours ago

That was the reason a few years ago I started this project.

It seems like software in AI-era should be distributed open source.

So that anyone could tweak it however he wants. Not though clunky plugins system.

> So that anyone could tweak it however he wants.

That was true before the "AI era" as well.

  • Well, yes.

    Just now, any regular user can clone the repository and ask an LLM to tune it to his needs.

    • I never thought about this before, and it hasn’t been mentioned significantly in the vast amount of AI threads I read here. But it’s a really good point as skeptical as I am (in mid-2026) of AI first codebases

      1 reply →

And the developers get compensated for their work how?

  • Not all software needs to be for-profit.

    Simple utility stuff I believe should fit in this category. Things like a text editor.

    The profit comes from elsewhere, larger more complex systems.

    Of course someone can TRY to profit off a text editor, but unless it solves complex enough problems (like a full blown IDE, but even then...).

    The issue is there is intense demand for it, and ALSO easy supply. If someone attempts a profit driving rugpull, another will pop up in it's place.

    I am still using Dendron because it meets my needs, but I'm always half tempted to replace it, and I'm fairly confident I could come up with something that meets my own needs in a day or two, and it would likely also be valuable to countless others. I just keep assuming that someone else will spend that day or two, and my pain points with Dendron are not that bad for me to spend the time.

  • Feels like a lot of apps that launch these days have an open source core app and a subscription based platform.

    The subscription based platform with automatic cloud hosting and other quality of life features, whatever those are depending on the app.

    Although there's a bunch of 100% open source projects and developers that get enough donations to make it their full time job just off of that. Not that it's the way to go if you want to get rich, but it's still very much a real thing.

  • Do you not sponsor projects that you get value out of?

    I'm not saying you have to, but you asked how they get compensated and there's nothing stopping you from giving them money.

    It's easy to forget that you get a lot of value out of something and not give back. If you end up getting a good paying job with your programming experience just buy your favorite projects "a beer" one a month, or once a year. God knows it's better spent there all the subscriptions we have like Netflix or Spotify. Cheaper too.

    Also, if the projects are big enough you can usually get tax credit. If you work at a decently sized company they also usually do some charity matching.

  • That's yet to be decided :D

    For the first time, I put a sponsorship button. Will see if it works.

  • Given the explosion of open source released projects I've seen over the past six months, I believe developers are getting compensated by the tool they are building for themselves creating real value for them.

    I have a problem, I spend a few days building a tool that solves the problem, it works pretty well for me, and I release it to let others get value from it. They make tweaks to it, perhaps improve it, and I get value from those enhancements and bugfixes.

  • Are you asking how the open source ecosystem works in general?

    In my experience, if the dev wishes to be compensated in dollars, they also sell a commercial license, cloud services, etc.

  • I don’t mean to be condescending but it feels like if this were an important question it would have halted OSS development decades ago.

    • But if the flip side (getting compensated) wasn't also an important concern then maybe far more software would be OSS in recent decades...

    • >but it feels like if this were an important question it would have halted OSS development decades ago

      no because the people who maintain the nuts and bolts of the open source world, like the often individual or handful contributors to projects like ffmpeg or xz-utils have been passionately doing that and at times burning out (which in case of the latter caused pretty prominent problems).

      Does the world look to you like it's in a state where important questions and problems don't go unanswered? The reason this stuff works is because there's random guys in a basement in Kentucky somewhere who thanklessly work their asses off and nobody cares. They simply keep doing it because half of the internet would fall apart otherwise.

Congratulations on making it tonthe front page. I think your app looks like a brilliant notes app implementation, and there's obviously demand. When I launched https://www.asnotes.io earlier this year (An extension that turns VS Code in to an Obsidian like PKMS) it made the number 4 spot. It's clearly something that people see as important and draws a lot of opinions. I hope your project does well.

> It seems like software in AI-era should be distributed open source.

That makes it easy for AI to be trained on it.

  • Yeah, also makes it easy for humans to train on it.

    That's the point of open source, sharing the knowledge.

    We'll all make the same shit over and over if noone shares.

    But if we all share, then the only thing left to make is the unknown.