← Back to context Comment by thesdev 4 hours ago I hope he appeals. Not cheering for Musk, cheering for the fight. 8 comments thesdev Reply mrhottakes 3 hours ago It would just burn more cash unless he can somehow go back in time and change the facts. thesdev 2 hours ago If anyone can afford burning cash for his ego it's the richest man in the world with the biggest ego in the world. hoppyhoppy2 2 hours ago Yes, and more burnt cash (and hopefully emotional energy) would be an acceptable outcome lapetitejort 4 hours ago Cross examination is one of the vanishingly few times you can see billionaires and executives act like human beings instead of sentient PR scripts. enraged_camel 4 hours ago There's nothing to appeal. Statute of limitations is... just that. lowkey_ 3 hours ago IANAL but civil statute of limitations is based on when the prosecuting party reasonably discovered they were wronged and had legal recourse, not when the event happened. It is entirely possible to debate when that was in this case. paulpauper 4 hours ago For criminal cases at least, the statue of limitations is not set in stone. But probably for civil, its much more cut and dry. mrhottakes 3 hours ago Criminal law actually has very specific statutes of limitation as well, depending on the crime.
mrhottakes 3 hours ago It would just burn more cash unless he can somehow go back in time and change the facts. thesdev 2 hours ago If anyone can afford burning cash for his ego it's the richest man in the world with the biggest ego in the world. hoppyhoppy2 2 hours ago Yes, and more burnt cash (and hopefully emotional energy) would be an acceptable outcome
thesdev 2 hours ago If anyone can afford burning cash for his ego it's the richest man in the world with the biggest ego in the world.
hoppyhoppy2 2 hours ago Yes, and more burnt cash (and hopefully emotional energy) would be an acceptable outcome
lapetitejort 4 hours ago Cross examination is one of the vanishingly few times you can see billionaires and executives act like human beings instead of sentient PR scripts.
enraged_camel 4 hours ago There's nothing to appeal. Statute of limitations is... just that. lowkey_ 3 hours ago IANAL but civil statute of limitations is based on when the prosecuting party reasonably discovered they were wronged and had legal recourse, not when the event happened. It is entirely possible to debate when that was in this case. paulpauper 4 hours ago For criminal cases at least, the statue of limitations is not set in stone. But probably for civil, its much more cut and dry. mrhottakes 3 hours ago Criminal law actually has very specific statutes of limitation as well, depending on the crime.
lowkey_ 3 hours ago IANAL but civil statute of limitations is based on when the prosecuting party reasonably discovered they were wronged and had legal recourse, not when the event happened. It is entirely possible to debate when that was in this case.
paulpauper 4 hours ago For criminal cases at least, the statue of limitations is not set in stone. But probably for civil, its much more cut and dry. mrhottakes 3 hours ago Criminal law actually has very specific statutes of limitation as well, depending on the crime.
mrhottakes 3 hours ago Criminal law actually has very specific statutes of limitation as well, depending on the crime.
It would just burn more cash unless he can somehow go back in time and change the facts.
If anyone can afford burning cash for his ego it's the richest man in the world with the biggest ego in the world.
Yes, and more burnt cash (and hopefully emotional energy) would be an acceptable outcome
Cross examination is one of the vanishingly few times you can see billionaires and executives act like human beings instead of sentient PR scripts.
There's nothing to appeal. Statute of limitations is... just that.
IANAL but civil statute of limitations is based on when the prosecuting party reasonably discovered they were wronged and had legal recourse, not when the event happened. It is entirely possible to debate when that was in this case.
For criminal cases at least, the statue of limitations is not set in stone. But probably for civil, its much more cut and dry.
Criminal law actually has very specific statutes of limitation as well, depending on the crime.