← Back to context Comment by the_doctah 7 hours ago And all he really did was gut the censorship engine. 3 comments the_doctah Reply pesus 7 hours ago Is that what we're calling allowing CSAM and promoting white supremacist rhetoric? the_doctah 4 hours ago >CSAMproof?>white supremacist rhetoricNot illegal so... ? zzrrt 27 minutes ago https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeoXkcd 1357: "you're saying the most compelling thing you can say about your position is that it’s not literally illegal to express"
pesus 7 hours ago Is that what we're calling allowing CSAM and promoting white supremacist rhetoric? the_doctah 4 hours ago >CSAMproof?>white supremacist rhetoricNot illegal so... ? zzrrt 27 minutes ago https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeoXkcd 1357: "you're saying the most compelling thing you can say about your position is that it’s not literally illegal to express"
the_doctah 4 hours ago >CSAMproof?>white supremacist rhetoricNot illegal so... ? zzrrt 27 minutes ago https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeoXkcd 1357: "you're saying the most compelling thing you can say about your position is that it’s not literally illegal to express"
zzrrt 27 minutes ago https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeoXkcd 1357: "you're saying the most compelling thing you can say about your position is that it’s not literally illegal to express"
Is that what we're calling allowing CSAM and promoting white supremacist rhetoric?
>CSAM
proof?
>white supremacist rhetoric
Not illegal so... ?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeo
Xkcd 1357: "you're saying the most compelling thing you can say about your position is that it’s not literally illegal to express"