← Back to context

Comment by asadm

2 hours ago

I feel like there still needs to be a penalty to OpenAI here even if that doesn't favor Musk (even though he funded the whole thing). It is still a theft.

Need standing to claim theft, need to be within statue of limitations.

It's not theft unless a jury says it is, they didn't say it is.

  • Every AI model swallowing the entire world of digital and physical data to then be resold back to the people will forever be the biggest heist ever pulled off in our lifetime. I’m shocked how little it gets talked about, and how convenient it is that many of these companies lost or burned their paper trails

    • 1. No if anything, the idea that works cant be built using other products without the express permission of the original author would be the greater heist.

      2. This has nothing to do with the case which was just Musk trying to punish his competitor.

My theory is this civil suit was used to expose Sam's (and Greg's) self-dealing and perjury. This was civil, now comes criminal.