Comment by krzyk
6 days ago
It is sad. I like programming, if I couldn't do it and had to write text (which I do hate, I'm not a writer) it would be make quite a sad world.
6 days ago
It is sad. I like programming, if I couldn't do it and had to write text (which I do hate, I'm not a writer) it would be make quite a sad world.
A pattern I've settled into is to write code but leave a TODO for every narrow thing I want the LLM to do for me. Then just tell the agent to fix the todos. It's often faster and easier to give "instructions" this way
I never thought about that, good idea.
Nothing stopping you from doing that in a post-LLM world
Of course you can always program by hand, no one is stopping you.
Not sure this is true for all of us. I bet many/some (unsure here) are told to use ai for their daily programming tasks.
“A tool so good its use is mandatory” :)
I actually use claudecode a lot, where it works it works very well for me.
Plenty of companies are forcing the use of AI to people.
In most cases you could work around that. For instance write the code yourself and make the AI write the tests. Or keep it busy writing superfluous documentation. Very few people are micromanaged to the extent that they can’t subvert the system.