Comment by embedding-shape

> Just because you _can_ do something with a tool, doesn't mean it's the right tool for the job. Just because someone has contorted their entire process to adapt to a misshapen tool, and gotten good results, doesn't mean that's the right thing to do.

Ok, I agree with this, don't use the wrong tool for the wrong job.

> It is reasonable to both use the right tool for the right job, and demand better tools than you currently have. Success with the wrong tool in the wrong job doesn't mean it's the right tool for the right job.

Yes, I agree with this too.

I'm still not sure how this relates to LLMs and particular this specific context. I claimed that the output of your agents depend on the developer driving it. You're saying "not every tool is right for every job", I agree with this too, but is that against/for what I said?

Could you just clearly write out exactly what you're arguing for here, no analogies or metaphors, just plain and simple, because I still feel like we're having two different conversations.