← Back to context Comment by mitghi 2 months ago Why Zero when there are countless alternatives? 2 comments mitghi Reply Garlef 2 months ago (Not specific to this language and I'm not vouching for this in any way, but:)I think one argument would be that the language seems to be effect based.This allows you to control what a program can do without auditing the code. mitghi 2 months ago I see the point you mention, in that case, I think a language like Haskell is the better choice, so it could be marketed as an "agents" language that hit the market three decades before today’s agents :)
Garlef 2 months ago (Not specific to this language and I'm not vouching for this in any way, but:)I think one argument would be that the language seems to be effect based.This allows you to control what a program can do without auditing the code. mitghi 2 months ago I see the point you mention, in that case, I think a language like Haskell is the better choice, so it could be marketed as an "agents" language that hit the market three decades before today’s agents :)
mitghi 2 months ago I see the point you mention, in that case, I think a language like Haskell is the better choice, so it could be marketed as an "agents" language that hit the market three decades before today’s agents :)
(Not specific to this language and I'm not vouching for this in any way, but:)
I think one argument would be that the language seems to be effect based.
This allows you to control what a program can do without auditing the code.
I see the point you mention, in that case, I think a language like Haskell is the better choice, so it could be marketed as an "agents" language that hit the market three decades before today’s agents :)