{"id":48200027,"user":"OGWhales","time":1779226648,"time_ago":"7 hours ago","type":"comment","content":"

I searched something like “top pro vs tea pro se reddit” so I kind of did.","comments":[{"id":48201900,"user":"DANmode","time":1779240315,"time_ago":"3 hours ago","type":"comment","content":"

“Kind of”, indeed.

> Please provide 1-5 forum discussions or social media comment threads discussing or comparing x and y.","comments":[{"id":48202099,"user":"OGWhales","time":1779241793,"time_ago":"3 hours ago","type":"comment","content":"

Well, that’s how I would ask an AI. I wasn’t asking an AI though, I was googling it","comments":[{"id":48202337,"user":"DANmode","time":1779243762,"time_ago":"2 hours ago","type":"comment","content":"

Google is “an AI”,

and has been for some time!,

was my point ^.^","comments":[{"id":48202951,"user":"OGWhales","time":1779249816,"time_ago":"42 minutes ago","type":"comment","content":"

I was only intending to use the traditional search engine, the AI was incidental. If I want an AI answer, I will go to it separately. This is better in my mind as optimal queries for each are different.

The issue is, Google has mixed the two in a way that promotes the AI response as primary. This has resulted in dubious answers being presented as “official” summaries (to the lay person).

At the very least, one would expect it to be a little smarter—perhaps by automatically doing things like you suggested—instead of basing things off a single source, as it seems to enjoy doing.","comments":[],"comments_count":0,"level":3,"url":"item?id=48202951"},{"id":48202991,"user":"topaz0","time":1779250353,"time_ago":"33 minutes ago","type":"comment","content":"

... And some of us would rather have old google","comments":[],"comments_count":0,"level":3,"url":"item?id=48202991"}],"comments_count":2,"level":2,"url":"item?id=48202337"}],"comments_count":3,"level":1,"url":"item?id=48202099"}],"comments_count":4,"level":0,"url":"item?id=48201900"}],"comments_count":5,"url":"item?id=48200027"}

Comment by OGWhales