← Back to context

Comment by Forgeties79

5 hours ago

The edits are likely why you’re getting downvoted so much tbh.

Trust me, the downvotes were instant.

People really hate it when you hold up a mirror to illustrate a problem. They tend to reflexively punch the mirror

  • Maybe take a moment to consider why people are choosing to use adblockers in the first place. And whether having content being monetized through and relying on ads is even a good thing overall (it's not). Advertising and marketing is fundamentally a negative for society in most cases.

    • >Maybe take a moment to consider why people are choosing to use adblockers in the first place.

      So they can get content without compensating for it.

      I've been on this train since the beginning. I was there when ad-block-plus read the writing on the wall 15 years ago and decided to make a truce with advertisers. It was clearly unsustainable for 50% of web users to be effectively parasites, so maybe we can negotiate on acceptable ad practices. But to the users, a truce with advertisers!?!? Ublock Origin was born days later.

      6 replies →

  • Man, I wish folks calibrated their E(I am actually wrong|downvotes). Have you considered what that value could be in this case?

    • Creators don't get compensation when people ad-block.

      Creators don't get compensation when LLMs scrape.

      It's totally, and completely, unambiguous. The internet just has collective brain damage from the grassroots morals of it being formed 30 years ago by teenagers. How surprising that a bunch of kids decided that the way to save the internet was to make it better for themselves, and worse for the people who make the internet the thing they love.

      Some of us have grown up now, and realize the correct answer to save the internet was to not engage with ad supported content period.

      5 replies →

  • The downvotes are for the unnecessarily aggressive approach, even from people without a major dog in the fight.