← Back to context

Comment by vessenes

5 hours ago

Sort of buried the lede here -- Apple uses the Inkwell name and has a trademark. This is just not going to get approved. Or, to quote Jobs talking to the iPodRip developer "Change your apps name. Not that big of a deal."

used. Apple used. It's legally a dead trademark, so Apple is claiming ownership of something they've already abandoned, but enforcing that nobody else can reclaim it, despite being a good name. That's not right, they don't just get to name squat.

  • What's legal doesn't matter, it's their store, if they want to claim they own the word Pear too they can do that.

    I think holding that kind of power over devices people own is problematic, but I seem to be in the minority here.

    • Amusingly, a bunch of series of teen shows used to use "Pear PC" to get around the trademark issue on all their on screen technology...

    • +1 .. the problem isn't that Apple is denying their app, the problem is the developer decided to submit it to the Apple store.

  • Fun fact: this same process is how Vietnam got its name. Their earlier proposal of Nam Viet had fallen out of use, but still couldn't get approval.

Perhaps you’re right. Apple's App Store review can be a rough process. Then again, a search of “Inkwell” in the App Store shows plenty of apps that are named “Inkwell”, many of then writing-related.

  • Oh I didn't say they'd be consistent. But once it's raised, it's going to be really tough.

    • Agreed. Vanishingly few enforcers have ever said "wait, we let other people do it? Ohhhh go ahead!"

      Much more extreme example, I read a court case where the cops were really annoyed the perp told them they should've been enforcing $muchWorseCrime elsewhere. Judge wasn't a fan either.